Giri v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 928
The appellant failed to respond by 28 September 2010 to the Tribunal's s 359A invitation dated 21 September 2010. Applying the construction definitively established by the Full Court in Hasran and the reasoning in M, that failure attracted ss 359C(2), 360(3) and 363A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), so that the appellant was not entitled to appear before the Tribunal and the Tribunal had no power to permit him to appear. The Federal Magistrates Court therefore correctly rejected the asserted jurisdictional error. The appellant also failed to demonstrate that the Federal Magistrate failed to have regard to the information sought by the 21 September 2010 letter or that any jurisdictional...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Review of a Migration Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Cancellation of a Student Visa
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['student Visa Cancellation' 'condition 8202' 'migration Review Tribunal Procedure' 'entitlement to Appear Before the Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'construction of Ss 359 a, 359 C, 360 and 363 a of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Review of a Migration Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Cancellation of a Student Visa
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant had any entitlement to appear before the Migration Review Tribunal after failing to respond by the nominated date to an invitation under s 359A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the Tribunal misconstrued its obligation to hold a hearing after it had already invited the appellant to appear before a later s 359C(2) event occurred.' 'Whether the Federal Magistrates Court erred by applying Hasran v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship and M v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs rather than the approach in Kumar v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship.' "Whether the Federal Magistrate failed to have regard to the nature of the information sought in the Tribunal's letter of 21 September 2010."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to respond by 28 September 2010 to the Tribunal's s 359A invitation dated 21 September 2010. Applying the construction definitively established by the Full Court in Hasran and the reasoning in M, that failure attracted ss 359C(2), 360(3) and 363A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), so that the appellant was not entitled to appear before the Tribunal and the Tribunal had no power to permit him to appear. The Federal Magistrates Court therefore correctly rejected the asserted jurisdictional error. The appellant also failed to demonstrate that the Federal Magistrate failed to have regard to the information sought by the 21 September 2010 letter or that any jurisdictional...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The Appeal is dismissed.' 'The Appellant pay the costs of the First Respondent of and incidental to the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment