R v ROGERSON [2005] NSWDC 22
Given the seriousness of the offence—lying under oath to the Police Integrity Commission, which undermines the administration of justice—and in the absence of extraordinary and compelling circumstances, a full-time custodial sentence is required. The offender's good character, mental condition, delay in prosecution, and circumstances of custody warrant recognition by finding special circumstances and setting a reduced non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- offender sentenced to imprisonment for two and a half years with a non-parole period of one year; offender to be released to parole at the end of non-parole period
- Legal Topics
- ['giving False Evidence' 'police Integrity Commission' 'sentencing' 'deterrence' 'perjury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for giving false evidence to the Police Integrity Commission' 'Assessment of seriousness of offence' 'Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify a non-custodial sentence' 'Prospects for rehabilitation and presence of remorse' 'Effect of delay in prosecution']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the offence—lying under oath to the Police Integrity Commission, which undermines the administration of justice—and in the absence of extraordinary and compelling circumstances, a full-time custodial sentence is required. The offender's good character, mental condition, delay in prosecution, and circumstances of custody warrant recognition by finding special circumstances and setting a reduced non-parole period.
Court Disposition
offender sentenced to imprisonment for two and a half years with a non-parole period of one year; offender to be released to parole at the end of non-parole period
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for two and a half years, commencing 18 February 2005.' 'A non-parole period of one year is set, expiring on 17 February 2006.' 'Offender to be released to parole at expiry of non-parole period.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment