Gladesville Property Group v Hunters Hill Council [2016] NSWLEC 1602
An agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was reached and was found to be a decision the Court could have made, requiring the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement without assessing the merits of the original dispute.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gladesville Property Group; Respondent: Hunters Hill Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application approved subject to conditions; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs for amended plans
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Residential Flat Building, Conciliation Conference, Appeal Upheld
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gladesville Property Group
Applicant
Hunters Hill Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for the demolition of existing improvements and construction of a two-storey residential flat building with attic comprising twenty-eight units
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was reached and was found to be a decision the Court could have made, requiring the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement without assessing the merits of the original dispute.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application approved subject to conditions; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs for amended plans
Orders
- Applicant is granted leave to rely upon specified amended plans/documents; Applicant to pay Respondent's costs thrown away in respect of amended plans/documents, agreed at $25,000, within 28 days; Appeal is upheld; Applicant's Development Application No. 2015/1211 is approved subject to annexed conditions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment