Smith v Smith [1948] HCA 26

Smith v Smith [1948] HCA 26

The agreement between the parties did not amount to real consent by the wife to a separation; rather, the husband's conduct rendered cohabitation impossible, constituting desertion. Therefore, the wife was entitled to a decree of dissolution under s. 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.).

Parties
Appellant: Gladys Vera Smith; Respondent: Henry John William Smith
Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Decree nisi for dissolution of marriage granted.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Desertion, Separation Agreement
Family Law Divorce Desertion Separation Agreement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gladys Vera Smith

Appellant

Henry John William Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Petition / Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the separation was by agreement so as to preclude a finding of desertion under s. 75(a) of Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.).
  2. 2 Whether the husband's conduct amounted to desertion.

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement between the parties did not amount to real consent by the wife to a separation; rather, the husband's conduct rendered cohabitation impossible, constituting desertion. Therefore, the wife was entitled to a decree of dissolution under s. 75(a) of the Marriage Act 1928 (Vict.).

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Decree nisi for dissolution of marriage granted.

Orders

  • Decree nisi for dissolution of marriage granted as of 6th October 1948.
  • Decree not to be made absolute until three months from 6th October 1948.