Glazier v Australian Men's Health (No.2) [2001] NSWSC 6
Plaintiff is entitled to an order for the taking of accounts on the basis of wilful default, supported by evidence, pleadings, and Mr Madden's report, and leave to amend the statement of claim to include relief on that basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Application / Post Judgment Directions
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' applications for directions as to accounts on basis of wilful default, and for amendment of statement of claim, granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['taking of Accounts' 'account of Administration' 'wilful Default' 'practice and Procedure' 'res Judicata' 'issue Estoppel']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Application / Post Judgment Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether accounts should be taken on the footing of wilful default' 'Whether relief on basis of wilful default must be pleaded' 'Whether consent orders establish wilful default by res judicata or issue estoppel' "Court's power to amend orders and pleadings post-judgment"]
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff is entitled to an order for the taking of accounts on the basis of wilful default, supported by evidence, pleadings, and Mr Madden's report, and leave to amend the statement of claim to include relief on that basis.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' applications for directions as to accounts on basis of wilful default, and for amendment of statement of claim, granted.
Orders
- ['Order for taking accounts on the basis of wilful default.' 'Leave granted to amend statement of claim to plead relief on footing of wilful default.' 'Directions to be made as to procedure for taking of accounts.' 'Parties to be heard on costs at a later date.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment