McCready & Anor; Estate of Lindsay Leslie McCready [2004] NSWSC 887
Section 72 of the Trustee Act 1925 does not confer power to make a vesting order extinguishing contingent interests of unborn persons unless there is a separately existing equitable entitlement; it is not a variation of trusts provision or a general vehicle for granting property outright to a life tenant in absence of children.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Order Under Statutory Provision / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['vesting Orders' 'contingent Rights of Unborn Persons' 'variation of Trusts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Claim for Order Under Statutory Provision / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Does section 72 of the Trustee Act 1925 permit vesting property in a life tenant free from contingent interests in unborn children?' 'Is section 72 a variation of trusts provision or limited to perfecting independently existing equitable interests?']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 72 of the Trustee Act 1925 does not confer power to make a vesting order extinguishing contingent interests of unborn persons unless there is a separately existing equitable entitlement; it is not a variation of trusts provision or a general vehicle for granting property outright to a life tenant in absence of children.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- ["The plaintiffs' claim for the order pursuant to section 72 of the Trustee Act 1925 sought in the amended summons is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment