Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] ACompT 7
The Tribunal held that given the nature of the proceeding and PNO’s conduct, which did not unduly prolong or complicate the proceedings and contributed helpfully, it was not appropriate to exercise the discretion to award costs against PNO under s 44KB(1).
- Parties
- Applicant: Glencore Coal Pty Ltd; Respondent: Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd; Intervener: National Competition Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review / Costs Decision Following Review of Minister's Decision
- Outcome
- Application for costs dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Services, Costs Discretion, Judicial Review of Ministerial Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glencore Coal Pty Ltd
Applicant
Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd
Respondent
National Competition Council
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Review / Costs Decision Following Review of Minister's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the Tribunal exercise its discretion under s 44KB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) to order costs against Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd?
- 2 What is the proper approach to costs in Tribunal review proceedings under Pt IIIA of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that given the nature of the proceeding and PNO’s conduct, which did not unduly prolong or complicate the proceedings and contributed helpfully, it was not appropriate to exercise the discretion to award costs against PNO under s 44KB(1).
Court Disposition
Application for costs dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The decision of the Acting Federal Treasurer made on 8 January 2016 not to declare the service under s 44H of Part IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) be set aside.
- The service is declared pursuant to s 44K(8) of Part IIIA, commencing 8 July 2016 and expiring 7 July 2031.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment