R v G J Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319
Although the sentencing judge erred by taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a plea of guilty, the error did not result in a sentence that was more severe than warranted according to the applicable sentencing principles; therefore, the appeal did not warrant reduction of sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed after leave granted; sentence stands despite error.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'discount for Plea of Guilty' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'relevance of Crown Case Strength' 'application of Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a guilty plea' 'Whether the sentence imposed should have been more lenient given the error']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the sentencing judge erred by taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a plea of guilty, the error did not result in a sentence that was more severe than warranted according to the applicable sentencing principles; therefore, the appeal did not warrant reduction of sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed after leave granted; sentence stands despite error.
Orders
- ['Leave to file an appeal out of time granted' 'Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment