R v G J Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319

R v G J Davies [2004] NSWCCA 319

Although the sentencing judge erred by taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a plea of guilty, the error did not result in a sentence that was more severe than warranted according to the applicable sentencing principles; therefore, the appeal did not warrant reduction of sentence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed after leave granted; sentence stands despite error.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'discount for Plea of Guilty' 'standard Non Parole Period' 'relevance of Crown Case Strength' 'application of Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Determination of Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a guilty plea' 'Whether the sentence imposed should have been more lenient given the error']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the sentencing judge erred by taking into account the strength of the Crown case when determining the discount for a plea of guilty, the error did not result in a sentence that was more severe than warranted according to the applicable sentencing principles; therefore, the appeal did not warrant reduction of sentence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed after leave granted; sentence stands despite error.

Orders

  • ['Leave to file an appeal out of time granted' 'Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']