Woods v Woods [2000] NSWSC 851

Woods v Woods [2000] NSWSC 851

The contract between Desre, Glenn, and Marcia included a term (express or implied) requiring Glenn and Marcia to maintain the property in a state fit for Desre's habitation. Glenn and Marcia's refusal to maintain the property from April 1995, evidenced by conduct and admissions, constituted a repudiation of the contract. Desre validly accepted the repudiation (at the latest by September 1999), thereby terminating the contract and entitling her to damages for loss of bargain; her initial pursuit of specific performance did not preclude this right as no final judgment was entered granting specific relief.

Parties
Plaintiff: Glenn Woods; Plaintiff: Marcia Woods; Defendant/cross Claimant: Desre Clair Woods; Defendant: Richard Lee Woods; Defendant: Amanda Jane Woods
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 2000
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings (contractual Dispute) / Judgment After Full Hearing on Cross Claim and Contract Termination
Outcome
Declaration granted that contract was repudiated and terminated on Desre's acceptance; Desre entitled to damages. Short minutes to be provided for further orders.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Repudiation, Implied Terms, Specific Performance, Damages, Election of Remedies
Contracts Equity Breach of Contract Repudiation Implied Terms Specific Performance Damages Election of Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Glenn Woods

Plaintiff

Marcia Woods

Plaintiff

Desre Clair Woods

Defendant/cross Claimant

Richard Lee Woods

Defendant

Amanda Jane Woods

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings (contractual Dispute) / Judgment After Full Hearing on Cross Claim and Contract Termination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Glenn and Marcia Woods were obliged to maintain the property for Desre Woods' occupation under the contract
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach or repudiation of such an obligation
  3. 3 Whether Desre Woods validly accepted the repudiation and terminated the contract

Ratio Decidendi

The contract between Desre, Glenn, and Marcia included a term (express or implied) requiring Glenn and Marcia to maintain the property in a state fit for Desre's habitation. Glenn and Marcia's refusal to maintain the property from April 1995, evidenced by conduct and admissions, constituted a repudiation of the contract. Desre validly accepted the repudiation (at the latest by September 1999), thereby terminating the contract and entitling her to damages for loss of bargain; her initial pursuit of specific performance did not preclude this right as no final judgment was entered granting specific relief.

Court Disposition

Declaration granted that contract was repudiated and terminated on Desre's acceptance; Desre entitled to damages. Short minutes to be provided for further orders.

Orders

  • Declaration that contract included a term requiring Glenn and Marcia to maintain the property for Desre's occupation.
  • Declaration that Glenn and Marcia repudiated the contract and repudiation was accepted by Desre, terminating the contract in September 1999.