Global Custodians Ltd v Bhagat [2002] FCA 701
The requirements of s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for making a sequestration order were satisfied and the respondent failed to establish any sufficient cause, including fraud, that would justify refusing the order.
- Parties
- Applicant: Global Custodians Ltd; Respondent: Hari Bhagat
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition Under Bankruptcy Act / Final Judgment on Making of Sequestration Order
- Outcome
- Sequestration order made against estate of Hari Bhagat.
- Legal Topics
- Creditor's Petition, Sequestration Order, Establishment of Act of Bankruptcy, Fraud Allegations as Sufficient Cause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Custodians Ltd
Applicant
Hari Bhagat
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition Under Bankruptcy Act / Final Judgment on Making of Sequestration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements for making a sequestration order under s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) were met
- 2 Whether there was sufficient cause not to make a sequestration order, including alleged fraudulent conduct by creditor
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements of s 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for making a sequestration order were satisfied and the respondent failed to establish any sufficient cause, including fraud, that would justify refusing the order.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order made against estate of Hari Bhagat.
Orders
- The estate of Hari Bhagat is sequestrated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment