GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES PTY LTD v LEGION TELECALL PTY LTD [2001] NSWCA 279

GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES PTY LTD v LEGION TELECALL PTY LTD [2001] NSWCA 279

By majority, clause 1(k) was unambiguous, wide and comprehensive. Legion had a contractual obligation to direct all relevant call processing requests through Global's call centre, but damages were only available where the breach resulted in an actual loss, not for the entirety of the lost minutes, as not all callers...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal and cross appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['breach of Contract' 'construction of Contract Terms' 'assessment of Damages' 'exclusive Dealing' 'best Endeavours']
['contract Law'] ['breach of Contract' 'construction of Contract Terms' 'assessment of Damages' 'exclusive Dealing' 'best Endeavours']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether clause 1(k) of the contract imposed an absolute duty on Legion to direct all 190 Psychic and related call processing requests through Global's call centre, including third party service providers' calls." 'Whether Legion breached the contract by failing to direct such calls.' 'Assessment of damages for breach.']

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, clause 1(k) was unambiguous, wide and comprehensive. Legion had a contractual obligation to direct all relevant call processing requests through Global's call centre, but damages were only available where the breach resulted in an actual loss, not for the entirety of the lost minutes, as not all callers or service providers would have agreed to use Global's call processing. The trial judge's assessment of 10% of the full claim was upheld. The appeal and cross appeal were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' 'Cross appeal dismissed with costs.']