Hansen v Noble [2021] NSWSC 138
Gloria did not make gifts to Tracey; the Court found the parties’ intentions were that Tracey would not be true owner until Gloria was reimbursed for her contributions to acquisition of the Wattle Grove property and later (by variation) payments towards the Lakesland property. Gloria's interest in the Wattle Grove property began as a proportional beneficial interest according to her contributions and increased with her continued payments. This interest arose on a resulting trust or common intention constructive trust; subsequently, arrangements evolved into a joint endeavour whose failure entitled Gloria in equity to be reimbursed for her total contributions (but not to interest prior to...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Principal Judgment / Post Hearing Judgment Parties to Confer and Provide Draft Orders
- Outcome
- Judgment reserved pending quantification and further submissions; declaration of beneficial interest in favour of Gloria and directions for parties to settle minutes of order.
- Legal Topics
- ['equitable Charges and Liens' 'resulting Trusts' 'common Intention Constructive Trusts' 'constructive Trusts on Failure of Joint Endeavour' 'equitable Interests in Property' 'equitable Remedies' 'equitable Compensation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Principal Judgment / Post Hearing Judgment Parties to Confer and Provide Draft Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether plaintiff's (Gloria's) contributions to Wattle Grove and Lakesland properties were gifts or conferred proprietary interests" 'Whether Tracey holds Wattle Grove property (and/or Lakesland property) on trust for Gloria or subject to equitable charge' 'Quantification of contributions and entitlement to reimbursement or proprietary interest' 'Effect of presumption of advancement between mother and daughter and whether it is rebutted' 'Proper relief including nature and extent of any beneficial/proprietary interest, compensation, and interest']
Ratio Decidendi
Gloria did not make gifts to Tracey; the Court found the parties’ intentions were that Tracey would not be true owner until Gloria was reimbursed for her contributions to acquisition of the Wattle Grove property and later (by variation) payments towards the Lakesland property. Gloria's interest in the Wattle Grove property began as a proportional beneficial interest according to her contributions and increased with her continued payments. This interest arose on a resulting trust or common intention constructive trust; subsequently, arrangements evolved into a joint endeavour whose failure entitled Gloria in equity to be reimbursed for her total contributions (but not to interest prior to...
Court Disposition
Judgment reserved pending quantification and further submissions; declaration of beneficial interest in favour of Gloria and directions for parties to settle minutes of order.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff entitled to declaration of beneficial interest (resulting or constructive trust) in Wattle Grove property to value of total contributions (including payments toward Lakesland property, outgoings, and mortgage repayments).' 'Plaintiff entitled to equitable compensation for unpaid amounts plus interest at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment