Gloxinia Investments Limited v Low & Anor [2013] NSWSC 1889
The vendor failed to comply with Special Condition 32.1 (a condition precedent) by not installing specified items by the completion date, was thus not entitled to terminate the contract, and the purchasers were entitled to treat the vendor's purported termination as repudiation and claim refund of deposit.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Statement of claim dismissed. Deposit to be refunded to purchasers. Vendor to pay costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Termination' 'remedies' 'conditions Precedent' "vendor's Obligations" 'repudiation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the vendor validly terminated the contract under clause 9' "Whether the vendor's election of remedies was effective" 'Whether the vendor complied with the condition precedent (Special Condition 32.1) prior to completion' "Whether the purchasers were entitled to treat the vendor's purported termination as repudiation"]
Ratio Decidendi
The vendor failed to comply with Special Condition 32.1 (a condition precedent) by not installing specified items by the completion date, was thus not entitled to terminate the contract, and the purchasers were entitled to treat the vendor's purported termination as repudiation and claim refund of deposit.
Court Disposition
Statement of claim dismissed. Deposit to be refunded to purchasers. Vendor to pay costs.
Orders
- ['Statement of claim dismissed' 'Plaintiffs to refund deposit to purchasers' 'Plaintiffs to pay costs of proceedings']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment