Chetwynd v Rose [2020] NSWSC 111

Chetwynd v Rose [2020] NSWSC 111

The contemporaneous documentary record, including Brian Chetwynd's own pre-dispute correspondence and Financial Position Report, the parties' January 2015 emails, the caveat, the Centrelink letter and Mr Herd's evidence, established that the Armidale Property was subject to the three way split agreement and was held by Glynis Rose on trust for herself, Brian Chetwynd and Jill Chetwynd in equal shares. The plaintiffs did not prove any separate oral agreement giving them exclusive beneficial ownership or requiring unanimous consent to sale, and any presumption of a resulting trust in favour of Wincot was rebutted by the parties' contrary intention. Glynis Rose was therefore entitled to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Concerning Trusts, Statutory Sale and Related Monetary and Corporations Act Claims / Principal Judgment After 2017 Hearing, Reopened 2018 Hearing and Further Written Submissions
Outcome
Armidale Property held by Glynis Rose on trust for herself, Brian Chetwynd and Jill Chetwynd in equal shares; Glynis Rose established entitlement to statutory sale unless the parties agree another solution; some adjustments and liabilities were established, but the plaintiffs' other claims failed.
Legal Topics
['resulting Trusts' 'beneficial Ownership of Land' 'statutory Trust for Sale Under S 66 G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw)' 'accounting Adjustments Between Co Owners' "directors' Duties and Financial Records" 'civil Standard of Proof and Credit Findings']
['equity' 'trusts and Trustees' 'property Law' 'corporations Law' 'evidence'] ['resulting Trusts' 'beneficial Ownership of Land' 'statutory Trust for Sale Under S 66 G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw)' 'accounting Adjustments Between Co Owners' "directors' Duties and Financial Records" 'civil Standard of Proof and Credit Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings Concerning Trusts, Statutory Sale and Related Monetary and Corporations Act Claims / Principal Judgment After 2017 Hearing, Reopened 2018 Hearing and Further Written Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Glynis Rose held the Armidale Property on trust exclusively for Brian and Jill Chetwynd, for Wincot Pty Ltd, or for herself, Brian and Jill in equal shares.' 'Whether there was an agreement that the Armidale Property could not be sold without unanimous consent.' 'Whether Glynis Rose was entitled to an order for statutory sale under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW).' 'Whether Glynis Rose or the plaintiffs were entitled to monetary adjustments or repayments arising from the Armidale Property, Neutral Bay Property, Wincot accounts and dividends.' "Whether Glynis Rose contravened provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in relation to Wincot's books and accounts."]

Ratio Decidendi

The contemporaneous documentary record, including Brian Chetwynd's own pre-dispute correspondence and Financial Position Report, the parties' January 2015 emails, the caveat, the Centrelink letter and Mr Herd's evidence, established that the Armidale Property was subject to the three way split agreement and was held by Glynis Rose on trust for herself, Brian Chetwynd and Jill Chetwynd in equal shares. The plaintiffs did not prove any separate oral agreement giving them exclusive beneficial ownership or requiring unanimous consent to sale, and any presumption of a resulting trust in favour of Wincot was rebutted by the parties' contrary intention. Glynis Rose was therefore entitled to...

Court Disposition

Armidale Property held by Glynis Rose on trust for herself, Brian Chetwynd and Jill Chetwynd in equal shares; Glynis Rose established entitlement to statutory sale unless the parties agree another solution; some adjustments and liabilities were established, but the plaintiffs' other claims failed.

Orders

  • ['Glynis Rose holds the Armidale Property on trust for herself, Brian Chetwynd and Jill Chetwynd in equal shares.' 'There is no agreement that the Armidale Property cannot be sold without unanimous agreement, and Glynis Rose is entitled to an order for statutory sale unless the parties agree another solution before...