Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 4) [2008] FCA 1737
Given the urgency arising from GMCA’s financial position and the implications of recent charges, as well as the need to finalise a judgment sum swiftly to preserve rights under the Corporations Act, a gross sum assessment of costs is appropriate. The broad discretion for such orders, interest of expedition, avoidance of delay and expense, and practical inability to tax costs in the time allowed all justify the order.
- Parties
- First Applicant: BLACK & DECKER INC; Second Applicant: BLACK & DECKER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD; Respondent: GMCA PTY LTD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application in Civil Proceedings (after Judgment on Liability and Quantum) / Post Judgment, Costs Order and Directions for Assessment
- Outcome
- Gross sum costs order and appointment of court expert for assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Gross Sum Costs, Cost Assessment, Corporations Act Voidable Transactions, Expedition in Cost Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BLACK & DECKER INC
First Applicant
BLACK & DECKER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
Second Applicant
GMCA PTY LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Application in Civil Proceedings (after Judgment on Liability and Quantum) / Post Judgment, Costs Order and Directions for Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a gross sum costs order should be made under O 62 r 4(2)(c) and (d) of the Federal Court Rules
- 2 Whether the financial circumstances and transactions of GMCA justify expedition of costs assessment
- 3 Appropriateness of appointing a court expert for gross sum assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Given the urgency arising from GMCA’s financial position and the implications of recent charges, as well as the need to finalise a judgment sum swiftly to preserve rights under the Corporations Act, a gross sum assessment of costs is appropriate. The broad discretion for such orders, interest of expedition, avoidance of delay and expense, and practical inability to tax costs in the time allowed all justify the order.
Court Disposition
Gross sum costs order and appointment of court expert for assessment.
Orders
- There shall be a gross sum assessment of the Applicants' costs under Order 62 Rule 4(2)(c) and (d) of the Federal Court Rules.
- Ms Meg Gourlay is appointed as court expert under Order 34 to assess the gross sum of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment