Gold and Copper Resources Pty Limited v The Hon. Chris Hartcher MP, Minister for Resources and Energy, Special Minister of State, Minister for the Central Coast and Newcrest Operations Limited [2013] NSWLEC 166
Leave to amend the points of claim was granted to the applicant, except for one paragraph ([107]) relating to expansion of the knowledge element. The amended pleadings were considered sufficiently articulated and the grounds fairly arguable. The interlocutory orders set a timetable and imposed costs arrangements tied to the outcome of the fourth ground at trial.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gold and Copper Resources Pty Limited; First Respondent: The Hon. Chris Hartcher MP, Minister for Resources and Energy, Special Minister of State, Minister for the Central Coast; Second Respondent: Newcrest Operations Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory (leave to Amend Points of Claim)
- Outcome
- Leave to amend points of claim granted (except paragraph [107]); interlocutory case management orders made; costs directions confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Amend Pleadings, Judicial Review, Exploration Licence Renewal, False and Misleading Representations, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gold and Copper Resources Pty Limited
Applicant
The Hon. Chris Hartcher MP, Minister for Resources and Energy, Special Minister of State, Minister for the Central Coast
First Respondent
Newcrest Operations Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory (leave to Amend Points of Claim)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend points of claim to add grounds challenging the renewal of an exploration licence, including allegations of false and misleading representations
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the points of claim was granted to the applicant, except for one paragraph ([107]) relating to expansion of the knowledge element. The amended pleadings were considered sufficiently articulated and the grounds fairly arguable. The interlocutory orders set a timetable and imposed costs arrangements tied to the outcome of the fourth ground at trial.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend points of claim granted (except paragraph [107]); interlocutory case management orders made; costs directions confirmed.
Orders
- The applicant granted leave to rely on further amended points of claim (except [107]).
- Applicant to file and serve further amended points of claim by 4pm 12 September 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment