Gold and Copper Resources Pty Ltd v The Minister for Resources and Energy [2012] NSWLEC 149
Leave to further amend the Points of Claim to allege fraudulent misrepresentation was refused because the pleading failed to adequately allege a nexus between the purported fraudulent conduct and the decision to renew EL 3856, and lacked necessary particularity and specificity in describing the misrepresentation and its communication to the Minister's delegate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gold and Copper Resources Pty Limited; First Respondent: The Minister for Resources and Energy; Second Respondent: Newcrest Mining Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Motion / Application for Leave to Amend Points of Claim
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed. Applicant to pay costs. Directions for further case management set.
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Review, Particularity in Fraud Claims, Leave to Amend
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gold and Copper Resources Pty Limited
Applicant
The Minister for Resources and Energy
First Respondent
Newcrest Mining Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Motion / Application for Leave to Amend Points of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to further amend points of claim to allege fraudulent misrepresentation in the renewal of mining exploration licence EL 3856
- 2 Whether the proposed pleading of fraud is sufficiently particularized and linked to the impugned decision
- 3 Whether delay and procedural history preclude granting of leave
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to further amend the Points of Claim to allege fraudulent misrepresentation was refused because the pleading failed to adequately allege a nexus between the purported fraudulent conduct and the decision to renew EL 3856, and lacked necessary particularity and specificity in describing the misrepresentation and its communication to the Minister's delegate.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed. Applicant to pay costs. Directions for further case management set.
Orders
- The applicant's notice of motion dated 3 May 2012 is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the costs of each respondent of that notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment