CRITTENDEN V. ANDERSON

CRITTENDEN V. ANDERSON

The petition's grounds—religious disqualification, alleged excessive election expenses, and improper use of government publications—are untenable at law; the first would impose an unconstitutional religious test, the second does not demonstrate excessive expenditure by the candidate, and the third lacks any legal merit. The petition is vexatious, oppressive and accordingly must be stayed.

Parties
Respondent: Gordon Anderson; Petitioner: Unnamed Petitioner
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 1950
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Application to Stay Proceedings
Outcome
Petition permanently stayed
Legal Topics
Vexatious Litigation, Disqualification From Parliament, Election Expenses, Religious Tests in Parliament
Electoral Law Constitutional Law Vexatious Litigation Disqualification From Parliament Election Expenses Religious Tests in Parliament

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gordon Anderson

Respondent

Unnamed Petitioner

Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Application to Stay Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petition alleging disqualification under s 44 of the Commonwealth Constitution has any reasonable prospect of success
  2. 2 Whether alleged breaches of electoral spending limits justify voiding the election
  3. 3 Whether use of government publications by a candidate may be counted as election expenses warranting invalidation

Ratio Decidendi

The petition's grounds—religious disqualification, alleged excessive election expenses, and improper use of government publications—are untenable at law; the first would impose an unconstitutional religious test, the second does not demonstrate excessive expenditure by the candidate, and the third lacks any legal merit. The petition is vexatious, oppressive and accordingly must be stayed.

Court Disposition

Petition permanently stayed

Orders

  • Proceedings on the petition be for ever stayed
  • Petitioner to pay the respondent's costs