Bunn, David & CSPU, the Community and Public Sector Union v Rennie, Gordon Andrew [1997] FCA 473
Rule 25B is valid and not oppressive under s 196(c) Workplace Relations Act 1996, and a Branch Council direction relating to voting is authorised by the rule.
- Parties
- First Appellant: David Bunn; Second Appellant: CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union; Respondent: Gordon Andrew Rennie
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Union Rules, Federal Councillor Voting Direction, Branch Council Authority
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
David Bunn
First Appellant
CPSU, The Community and Public Sector Union
Second Appellant
Gordon Andrew Rennie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rule under which direction given was valid
- 2 Whether Branch Council a body authorised to give such direction
- 3 Whether direction directory or mandatory
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 25B is valid and not oppressive under s 196(c) Workplace Relations Act 1996, and a Branch Council direction relating to voting is authorised by the rule.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment