In the matter of Belinda International Pty Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) ACN 055 392 777 [2011] NSWSC 1283

In the matter of Belinda International Pty Ltd (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) ACN 055 392 777 [2011] NSWSC 1283

The proceedings are not an abuse of process as they are brought to set aside the DOCA for legitimate reasons, and the involvement and funding by ARM do not render them contrary to public policy. Even if ARM controls the litigation, such funding and control do not alone establish abuse, particularly where Mr Devin stands to benefit directly.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Dismissal of Interlocutory Process
Outcome
First defendant's interlocutory process dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['abuse of Process' 'public Policy' 'litigation Funding' 'deed of Company Arrangement (doca)' 'termination of Doca']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Dismissal of Interlocutory Process

  1. 1 ['Whether proceedings are an abuse of process due to ulterior purpose or public policy' 'Whether ARM funding and controlling the proceedings constitutes abuse of process' 'Whether proceedings are brought for a collateral or ulterior purpose']

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings are not an abuse of process as they are brought to set aside the DOCA for legitimate reasons, and the involvement and funding by ARM do not render them contrary to public policy. Even if ARM controls the litigation, such funding and control do not alone establish abuse, particularly where Mr Devin stands to benefit directly.

Court Disposition

First defendant's interlocutory process dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ["The first defendant's interlocutory process dated 27 October 2011 be dismissed with costs"]