Moore v Moore [2004] NSWSC 587

Moore v Moore [2004] NSWSC 587

Although the adult sons had some financial and health needs and might have received provision if the estate were larger, the estate was essentially the widow's home plus about $55,000. The deceased's paramount duty was to leave the widow the home in which she and the deceased had lived, and the balance passing to the sons on intestacy meant there was no inadequate provision requiring a family provision order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Act 1982 Applications / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['family Provision' 'intestacy' "widow's Entitlement to Dwelling House" 'adult Children Claims' 'small Estate' 'costs Out of Estate']
['succession' 'equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['family Provision' 'intestacy' "widow's Entitlement to Dwelling House" 'adult Children Claims' 'small Estate' 'costs Out of Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Act 1982 Applications / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the provision made for each adult son on intestacy was inadequate for his proper maintenance, education and advancement in life under the Family Provision Act 1982.' "Whether the deceased's paramount duty to provide for his widow required that she retain the Hunters Hill home despite the adult sons' financial and health needs." "Whether the widow's exercise of rights under s 61D of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898 affected the availability of the home for family provision orders."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the adult sons had some financial and health needs and might have received provision if the estate were larger, the estate was essentially the widow's home plus about $55,000. The deceased's paramount duty was to leave the widow the home in which she and the deceased had lived, and the balance passing to the sons on intestacy meant there was no inadequate provision requiring a family provision order.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiffs' claim is dismissed." "The defendant's costs are to be paid out of the estate."]