Gosch C v Snowy River S C [2004] NSWLEC 158
The existence of double beds in one-person rooms does not necessarily constitute a breach of development consent if there is no evidence of more than one person using the room; the appropriate remedy is managerial control and record-keeping. Further, the use of the manager's suite in its current configuration is consistent with the approved use as on-farm tourist accommodation if a building certificate is obtained; thus, strict reinstatement is not required subject to fire safety compliance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals partially allowed; most orders made by consent with modifications for outstanding issues.
- Legal Topics
- ['designated Development' 'on Farm Tourist Accommodation Facility' 'development Consent Conditions' 'enforcement of Planning Controls']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether provision of double beds in single-person bedrooms breached development consent condition 12' "Whether current use of manager's suite and alterations (including kitchen provision) require re-instatement to approved uses or justify orders sought" 'Whether fire safety and BCA compliance necessitate removal of kitchen or reinstatement of hobby/music room']
Ratio Decidendi
The existence of double beds in one-person rooms does not necessarily constitute a breach of development consent if there is no evidence of more than one person using the room; the appropriate remedy is managerial control and record-keeping. Further, the use of the manager's suite in its current configuration is consistent with the approved use as on-farm tourist accommodation if a building certificate is obtained; thus, strict reinstatement is not required subject to fire safety compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeals partially allowed; most orders made by consent with modifications for outstanding issues.
Orders
- ['Make consent orders as per Exhibit 1 for appeal 11257 of 2003.' 'Make orders 1 through 5 as per Exhibit 2 for appeal 11260 of 2003; order 6 suspended for building certificate.' "Make orders 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11 as per Exhibit 3 for appeal 11259 of 2003; orders 5, 7, 9 altered to require rooms used by one person at a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment