GOSFORD CITY COUNCIL v GIO GENERAL LTD [2003] NSWCA 34
Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) cannot relieve the insured of temporal restrictions inherent in claims made policies. Section 40(3) does not apply unless written notice of facts that might give rise to a claim is given before the period of insurance expires. As no notice was given, neither...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gosford City Council; Respondent: GIO General Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Professional Indemnity Policy, Claims Made Insurance, Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (cth), Notification Requirements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gosford City Council
Appellant
GIO General Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s54 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) allows relief from temporal limits for notification under a claims made policy
- 2 Whether s40(3) transforms a claims made policy into a discovery policy and thereby extends cover when notice is not given within the policy period
Ratio Decidendi
Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) cannot relieve the insured of temporal restrictions inherent in claims made policies. Section 40(3) does not apply unless written notice of facts that might give rise to a claim is given before the period of insurance expires. As no notice was given, neither section operated to provide indemnity for the claim made after the policy period.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment