GPT RE Limited v Valuer-General [2010] NSWLEC 220
In light of the upcoming expression of interest process for the sale of two subject lots and its relevance to the determination of land value, together with absence of party fault or avoidable delay, the vacation of the s 34 conciliation conference was appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: GPT RE Limited; Respondent: Valuer-General
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Application for Vacation of Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- application granted; conference vacated and orders made for resetting and directions hearing
- Legal Topics
- Application for Vacation of S 34 Conciliation Conference, Valuation Disputes, Land Tax, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GPT RE Limited
Applicant
Valuer-General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Application for Vacation of Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the s 34 conciliation conference should be vacated in light of the impending sale of subject land parcels
Ratio Decidendi
In light of the upcoming expression of interest process for the sale of two subject lots and its relevance to the determination of land value, together with absence of party fault or avoidable delay, the vacation of the s 34 conciliation conference was appropriate.
Court Disposition
application granted; conference vacated and orders made for resetting and directions hearing
Orders
- The order for the three proceedings to be set down for a s 34 conciliation conference on 27 October 2010 is vacated.
- The parties are granted leave to approach the Registrar to set the proceedings down for a new s 34 conciliation conference on a date at least 14 days after 18 November 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment