GPV18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 393

None of the applicant's proposed grounds for review were sufficiently arguable or demonstrated apparent merit to warrant leave to appeal; the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for non-appearance; the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed as no substantial injustice or sufficient doubt attended the primary judge's decision.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 26 March 2020
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: ['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error']

['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal were refused' "Whether the primary judge's decision was attended with sufficient doubt to justify reconsideration" "Whether the applicant's proposed grounds of review had apparent merit or demonstrated an arguable case" 'Whether the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for failure to appear at the first court date']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

["The applicant's application for leave to appeal be dismissed." "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs."]