Edwards, Graham v Tandeer Pty Ltd In the Matter of Tandeer Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 720

Edwards, Graham v Tandeer Pty Ltd In the Matter of Tandeer Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 720

The application is without any proper legal or evidentiary basis and is not substantively different from a previous application dismissed by Einfeld J; therefore, the Registrar should not accept the process for filing.

Parties
Applicant: Graham Edwards; Respondent: Tandeer Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment on Application
Outcome
Application refused; order that Registrar not accept filing of process sought by Mr Edwards.

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham Edwards

Applicant

Tandeer Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there is any proper legal or evidentiary basis for the application by Mr Edwards.

Ratio Decidendi

The application is without any proper legal or evidentiary basis and is not substantively different from a previous application dismissed by Einfeld J; therefore, the Registrar should not accept the process for filing.

Court Disposition

Application refused; order that Registrar not accept filing of process sought by Mr Edwards.

Orders

  • The Registrar is directed under order 46 rule 7A not to accept the process which has been sought to be filed by Mr Edwards in relation to the matter.