Commissioner of Police v Gallagher [1988] AFPDT 4

Commissioner of Police v Gallagher [1988] AFPDT 4

The evidence, while capable of raising suspicion, did not reach the standard that could satisfy a tribunal of fact acting reasonably beyond reasonable doubt of Senior Constable Gallagher’s guilt; thus, he was found not guilty of the charge.

Parties
Complainant: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Graham John Gallagher
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 November 1988
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceeding / Decision and Reasons for Decision
Outcome
not guilty
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Proceedings, Standard of Proof, Costs in Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner of Police

Complainant

Graham John Gallagher

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Disciplinary Proceeding / Decision and Reasons for Decision

  1. 1 Whether Senior Constable Graham John Gallagher committed a disciplinary offence by supplying a blank medical certificate form to Peter Francis Roberts
  2. 2 Whether the evidence was sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether costs should be ordered in favour of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence, while capable of raising suspicion, did not reach the standard that could satisfy a tribunal of fact acting reasonably beyond reasonable doubt of Senior Constable Gallagher’s guilt; thus, he was found not guilty of the charge.

Court Disposition

not guilty

Orders

  • Senior Constable Graham John Gallagher is found not guilty of the disciplinary offence charged.
  • The costs of the proceedings before the Tribunal incurred by Senior Constable Graham John Gallagher are to be paid by the Commonwealth.