Smith v Repatriation Commission [2004] FCA 743
The appellant did not satisfy the requirements of s 24(1)(c) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) because he ceased remunerative work for reasons other than incapacity from war-caused injury or disease, and he was not prevented from continuing work solely by reason of such incapacity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Pension' 'special Rate of Pension' 'war Caused Injury' 'remunerative Work' "veterans' Entitlements Act S 24"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant satisfied the requirements of s 24(1)(c) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth)" 'Whether the appellant ceased remunerative work for reasons other than incapacity from war-caused injury or disease' 'Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in its application of the law under s 24']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not satisfy the requirements of s 24(1)(c) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) because he ceased remunerative work for reasons other than incapacity from war-caused injury or disease, and he was not prevented from continuing work solely by reason of such incapacity.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment