Graham THEWLIS v R [2008] NSWCCA 176
Immediate post offence ameliorative conduct, where it is significant and causally linked to a substantially beneficial outcome for the victim, is a proper matter to be considered in mitigation of sentence, and in this case justifies a reduction in the sentence imposed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Graham Thewlis; Respondent: Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed with respect to sentence for Count 1; sentence quashed and substituted.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Maliciously Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm, Malicious Wounding, Mitigation, Manifest Excess, Objective Seriousness, Plea of Guilty, Ameliorative Post Offence Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graham Thewlis
Applicant
Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentence was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the trial judge failed to adequately take into account mitigation, particularly immediate ameliorative conduct after the commission of the offence
- 3 Assessment of the objective seriousness of the offence
Ratio Decidendi
Immediate post offence ameliorative conduct, where it is significant and causally linked to a substantially beneficial outcome for the victim, is a proper matter to be considered in mitigation of sentence, and in this case justifies a reduction in the sentence imposed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed with respect to sentence for Count 1; sentence quashed and substituted.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- In respect of Count 1, appeal allowed and sentence quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment