Wallin v Pascoe [2002] FCA 1240

Wallin v Pascoe [2002] FCA 1240

The appeal must be dismissed because the property has already been sold, rendering any possible relief nugatory, and continuation of proceedings is an abuse of court process, causing unnecessary costs to parties and creditors.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sequestration Orders' 'trustee Appointment' 'vacating Property' 'abuse of Court Process']
['bankruptcy'] ['sequestration Orders' 'trustee Appointment' 'vacating Property' 'abuse of Court Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Magistrate's order compelling the appellant to vacate the property should be set aside" "Whether orders relating to the trustee's appointment should be made" 'Whether the appeal can succeed concerning sequestration orders']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal must be dismissed because the property has already been sold, rendering any possible relief nugatory, and continuation of proceedings is an abuse of court process, causing unnecessary costs to parties and creditors.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'Costs in the matter be costs in the administration.']