City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70

City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70

Grand Epping Pty Ltd was convicted and fined for intentionally aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring others to commit breaches of development consent conditions under s 4.2(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, resulting in substantial environmental harm through the removal of 21 trees and failure to install required tree protections. The penalties reflect the objective seriousness of the offences—moderate to high for the tree removal and low to moderate for the tree protection—and account for mitigating factors such as absence of prior convictions, assistance to authorities, and an early guilty plea, but only limited contrition. General and specific deterrence...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 July 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Environmental Prosecution (sentence) / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Outcome
Defendant convicted and fined; remediation and costs ordered.
Legal Topics
['breaches of Development Consent' 'unlawful Tree Removal' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences' 'strict Liability Offences' 'remediation Orders']
['environmental Law' 'planning Law' 'criminal Law'] ['breaches of Development Consent' 'unlawful Tree Removal' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences' 'strict Liability Offences' 'remediation Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Environmental Prosecution (sentence) / Sentencing After Guilty Plea

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring breaches of conditions of development consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979?' 'What is the objective seriousness of the offences committed by Grand Epping Pty Ltd?' 'What principles and measures are relevant to sentencing for environmental offences involving tree removal and lack of tree protection?']

Ratio Decidendi

Grand Epping Pty Ltd was convicted and fined for intentionally aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring others to commit breaches of development consent conditions under s 4.2(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, resulting in substantial environmental harm through the removal of 21 trees and failure to install required tree protections. The penalties reflect the objective seriousness of the offences—moderate to high for the tree removal and low to moderate for the tree protection—and account for mitigating factors such as absence of prior convictions, assistance to authorities, and an early guilty plea, but only limited contrition. General and specific deterrence...

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted and fined; remediation and costs ordered.

Orders

  • ['1. Grand Epping convicted as charged in both proceedings.' '2. Grand Epping fined $90,000 for the tree removal offence and $10,000 for the tree protection offence (total $100,000).' '3. Pursuant to s 9.56(3) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Grand Epping to undertake specified tree and vegetation...