Grant Crowle and Megan Crowle v Leichhardt Council [2006] NSWLEC 255
The proposal for alteration and addition to the dwelling, including a new first floor and detached garage, fails due to its gross and out-of-character streetscape impact in the heritage conservation area, and does not demonstrate the sensitivity required under the applicable planning controls.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'streetscape Impact' 'heritage Conservation Area' 'floor Space Ratio' 'landscaped Area' 'privacy' 'laneway Development']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development adversely impacts the streetscape in a heritage conservation area' 'Compliance with floor space ratio requirements' 'Compliance with landscaped area requirements' 'Compliance with building envelope and siting controls' 'Appropriateness of built form, elevations, and materials' 'Compliance with laneway development controls' 'Impacts on visual and acoustic privacy' 'Vehicular access sufficiency' 'Potential encroachment on neighbouring land']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal for alteration and addition to the dwelling, including a new first floor and detached garage, fails due to its gross and out-of-character streetscape impact in the heritage conservation area, and does not demonstrate the sensitivity required under the applicable planning controls.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is dismissed.' 'Development application No D/2004/197 to alter and add to the dwelling at No 64 Campbell Street, Balmain is refused consent.' 'The exhibits except for Exhibits A and B are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment