Matthews, Grant v ACP Publishing Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1122
The Federal Court possesses the jurisdiction and statutory power to award damages, in addition to or in lieu of an injunction, for breach of the statutory right of restraint under s 35(5) of the Copyright Act 1968. Where a photographer's work is used outside the specific purpose agreed, and an injunction (or its equivalent) is granted, compensation for the lost opportunity to negotiate a further licence fee is appropriate. In this case, such damages should be calculated on the value of the lost chance to negotiate, assessed broadly based on industry practice and the hypothetical negotiation between the parties.
- Parties
- Applicant: Grant Matthews; Respondent: ACP Publishing Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application (copyright) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Applicant awarded damages; respondent's undertaking accepted in lieu of injunction.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Right of Restraint Under Copyright Act S 35(5), Damages in Addition to Injunction, Scope of Copyright Assignments, Breach of Agreement Regarding Use of Commissioned Work
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grant Matthews
Applicant
ACP Publishing Pty Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application (copyright) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant is entitled to relief beyond restraining use of photograph under s 35(5) Copyright Act 1968
- 2 Whether damages are available for breach of statutory right of restraint under s 35(5)
- 3 Whether damages can be awarded in addition to or in lieu of injunction (or undertaking)
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court possesses the jurisdiction and statutory power to award damages, in addition to or in lieu of an injunction, for breach of the statutory right of restraint under s 35(5) of the Copyright Act 1968. Where a photographer's work is used outside the specific purpose agreed, and an injunction (or its equivalent) is granted, compensation for the lost opportunity to negotiate a further licence fee is appropriate. In this case, such damages should be calculated on the value of the lost chance to negotiate, assessed broadly based on industry practice and the hypothetical negotiation between the parties.
Court Disposition
Applicant awarded damages; respondent's undertaking accepted in lieu of injunction.
Orders
- Respondent gives undertaking to the Court in the terms of para. 3 of the applicant's application dated 9 September 1997.
- Respondent to pay applicant the sum of $1,650.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment