Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Grant Wesley Turnbull (No 4) [2020] NSWLEC 124
The accusatorial principle operates to prevent the Prosecutor from using admissions only when those admissions are the result of compulsion. Here, the Defendant failed to establish that his admissions in the prior civil (Class 4) proceedings were made under compulsion, as criminal proceedings were not pending or likely at the time, and there was no evidence that he was required to make the admissions in order to defend the civil case. Accordingly, the principle does not bar the Prosecutor from using the admissions, and there is no basis for a temporary stay or for excluding the legal team with knowledge of the admissions.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage; Defendant: Grant Wesley Turnbull
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (class 5) / Pre Trial Motion to Stay Proceedings
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Accusatorial Principle, Admissions in Prior Civil Proceedings, Stay of Proceedings, Compulsion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage
Prosecutor
Grant Wesley Turnbull
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal (class 5) / Pre Trial Motion to Stay Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of admissions made by the Defendant in prior civil proceedings (Class 4) in subsequent criminal proceedings amounts to a breach of the accusatorial principle
- 2 Whether those admissions were made under compulsion such that their use by the prosecutor would be unfair or unlawful
- 3 Whether a temporary stay is warranted to quarantine the prosecutor's legal team from knowledge of the admissions
Ratio Decidendi
The accusatorial principle operates to prevent the Prosecutor from using admissions only when those admissions are the result of compulsion. Here, the Defendant failed to establish that his admissions in the prior civil (Class 4) proceedings were made under compulsion, as criminal proceedings were not pending or likely at the time, and there was no evidence that he was required to make the admissions in order to defend the civil case. Accordingly, the principle does not bar the Prosecutor from using the admissions, and there is no basis for a temporary stay or for excluding the legal team with knowledge of the admissions.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- The Notice of Motion is dismissed.
- The exhibits are returned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment