GREENFREIGHT PTY LIMITED v ROACH [1990] NSWCA 79
The judge's assessment of lump sums was affected by an erroneous application of s8(1)(b) regarding weekly payments; thus, the entire award must be set aside, and the matter remitted to the Compensation Court for proper determination in light of the correct legal interpretation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Greenfreight Pty Limited; Respondent: Roach
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Award set aside and matter remitted
- Legal Topics
- Dependency, Partial Dependency, Weekly Payments, Assessment of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greenfreight Pty Limited
Appellant
Roach
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s8(1)(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1926 requires weekly payments to children partially dependent on the deceased as of right
- 2 Whether the assessment of lump sums was affected by an error of law regarding the entitlement to weekly payments
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's assessment of lump sums was affected by an erroneous application of s8(1)(b) regarding weekly payments; thus, the entire award must be set aside, and the matter remitted to the Compensation Court for proper determination in light of the correct legal interpretation.
Court Disposition
Award set aside and matter remitted
Orders
- Award set aside
- Matter remitted to the Compensation Court to do therein as shall be just and consistent with this Court's judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment