Greenhills Securities Pty Ltd v Loire Consultants Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 13

Greenhills Securities Pty Ltd v Loire Consultants Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 13

Applications to set aside multiple statutory demands may be brought together where there is no express statutory prohibition and the procedural rules permit, especially where the demands share common factual questions. Where a genuine dispute exists as to the creditor or amount of the debt, or the demand is substantially defective, the demand should be set aside. In this case, the second and third statutory demands were set aside due to genuine disputes over debt and substantial defects, and procedural irregularities did not result in injustice or warrant dismissal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Statutory Demands / Principal Judgment (final Orders on Application)
Outcome
Statutory demands set aside; costs awarded to plaintiff
Legal Topics
['winding Up' 'statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'defective Statutory Demand' 'joinder of Claims/applications' 'service of Process']
['corporations Law' 'equity'] ['winding Up' 'statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'defective Statutory Demand' 'joinder of Claims/applications' 'service of Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Statutory Demands / Principal Judgment (final Orders on Application)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether separate applications are required for each statutory demand under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459G' 'Whether there is a genuine dispute in relation to debts claimed in the statutory demands' 'Whether the statutory demands are defective in a way causing substantial injustice under s 459J' 'Whether the supporting affidavits meet requirements under s 459G(3)' 'Whether defects in the originating process or late service necessitated dismissal of application']

Ratio Decidendi

Applications to set aside multiple statutory demands may be brought together where there is no express statutory prohibition and the procedural rules permit, especially where the demands share common factual questions. Where a genuine dispute exists as to the creditor or amount of the debt, or the demand is substantially defective, the demand should be set aside. In this case, the second and third statutory demands were set aside due to genuine disputes over debt and substantial defects, and procedural irregularities did not result in injustice or warrant dismissal.

Court Disposition

Statutory demands set aside; costs awarded to plaintiff

Orders

  • ["The first defendant's statutory demand dated 2 September 2014 claiming $207,594.27 be set aside." "The first defendant's statutory demand dated 3 September 2014 claiming $207,594.27 be set aside." "The second defendant's statutory demand dated 19 September 2014 claiming $261,535.00 be set aside." "The defendants...