Boyce v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1561
As an agreement was reached by the parties during conciliation and the Commissioner was satisfied the decision was one the Court could properly make, the orders reflected that agreement and disposed of the proceedings accordingly. No merits assessment was required.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted on agreed conditions; costs ordered as agreed.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to make orders by consent under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 following agreement at conciliation conference']
Ratio Decidendi
As an agreement was reached by the parties during conciliation and the Commissioner was satisfied the decision was one the Court could properly make, the orders reflected that agreement and disposed of the proceedings accordingly. No merits assessment was required.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted on agreed conditions; costs ordered as agreed.
Orders
- ['Leave to rely on amended plans (specified by drawing and date) granted to Applicant.' "Applicant to pay Respondent's costs agreed at $3,000.00 upon execution of this Agreement pursuant to s 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development consent is granted to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment