Cronin v Norris [2010] NSWSC 434
Plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for preliminary discovery only in limited categories and scope. Orders for preliminary discovery were granted for certain documents (MYOB business records, worksheet templates, certain invoices, communications relating to establishment of new business or solicitation), but refused for other categories where evidence showed documents either not relevant, already available, or did not exist. Costs were apportioned to reflect partial success; plaintiffs ordered to pay 50% of defendant's costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Preliminary Discovery / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application for preliminary discovery partially allowed; costs apportioned.
- Legal Topics
- ['preliminary Discovery' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Preliminary Discovery / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether plaintiffs are entitled to preliminary discovery under Part 5.3 of Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)' 'Whether plaintiffs have satisfied all requirements for preliminary discovery' 'Appropriate scope of preliminary discovery' 'Entitlement to costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for preliminary discovery only in limited categories and scope. Orders for preliminary discovery were granted for certain documents (MYOB business records, worksheet templates, certain invoices, communications relating to establishment of new business or solicitation), but refused for other categories where evidence showed documents either not relevant, already available, or did not exist. Costs were apportioned to reflect partial success; plaintiffs ordered to pay 50% of defendant's costs.
Court Disposition
Application for preliminary discovery partially allowed; costs apportioned.
Orders
- ['Order for limited preliminary discovery in categories 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), and limited scope of categories 2 and 3.' 'No order for discovery in categories 1(d), 1(e), and categories 4-8.' "Plaintiffs to pay 50% of defendant's costs on the application and bear their own costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment