Ray v Perrett (No. 5) [2008] FCA 421
Because the respondent was served with a bankruptcy notice, failed to comply, did not establish a valid counter-claim, set-off, or cross-demand, and the petition debt remains owing, the requirements of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for making a sequestration order were satisfied. Accordingly, a sequestration order against the estate of Paul Perrett was warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Greg Ray; Respondent: Paul Perrett
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Hearing and Determination of Creditor's Petition With Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Sequestration order made against the estate of Paul Perrett. Costs awarded to the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Sequestration Order, Creditor's Petition, Service of Process, Acts of Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greg Ray
Applicant
Paul Perrett
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Hearing and Determination of Creditor's Petition With Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a sequestration order should be made against Paul Perrett's estate under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) based on a creditor's petition and an act of bankruptcy
Ratio Decidendi
Because the respondent was served with a bankruptcy notice, failed to comply, did not establish a valid counter-claim, set-off, or cross-demand, and the petition debt remains owing, the requirements of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for making a sequestration order were satisfied. Accordingly, a sequestration order against the estate of Paul Perrett was warranted.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order made against the estate of Paul Perrett. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- A sequestration order be made against the estate of Paul Perrett.
- The applicant creditor's costs be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment