Laughton v Gye [2019] FCA 2165
From 12 July 2018, when the judgment sum was paid into court, the applicant became a secured creditor and could not pursue the Creditor's Petition as an unsecured creditor. Accordingly, he was only entitled to his costs up to that date. The respondent was entitled to costs incurred after that date, excluding the case management hearing on 18 July 2018.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gregory Allan Laughton; Respondent: Clement Anthony Gye
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Creditor's Petition / Post Dismissal, Costs Allocation
- Outcome
- Mixed costs orders: some costs awarded to applicant, others to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Creditor's Petition, Secured Creditor Status, Lump Sum Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gregory Allan Laughton
Applicant
Clement Anthony Gye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination Following Dismissal of Creditor's Petition / Post Dismissal, Costs Allocation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was a secured creditor under s 4 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) following payment into the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
- 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to indemnity costs.
- 3 Whether the applicant's costs should be determined on a lump sum basis under r 40.02(b) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Ratio Decidendi
From 12 July 2018, when the judgment sum was paid into court, the applicant became a secured creditor and could not pursue the Creditor's Petition as an unsecured creditor. Accordingly, he was only entitled to his costs up to that date. The respondent was entitled to costs incurred after that date, excluding the case management hearing on 18 July 2018.
Court Disposition
Mixed costs orders: some costs awarded to applicant, others to respondent.
Orders
- The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the Creditor's Petition prior to 12 July 2018 in the sum of $4,138.30.
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the Creditor's Petition from 12 July 2018 (excluding the costs of the 18 July 2018 case management hearing) in a sum to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment