Gipp v The Queen [1998] HCA 21

Gipp v The Queen [1998] HCA 21

The appeal was allowed because the trial judge's directions in respect of general background evidence of sexual abuse were erroneous and insufficient, creating a substantial possibility the jury was mistaken or misled; this amounted to a miscarriage of justice under s 668E of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld). Accordingly, the convictions were quashed and a new trial ordered.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queensland Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'propensity/tendency Evidence' 'misdirection' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'grounds for Appeal']
['criminal Law'] ['unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'propensity/tendency Evidence' 'misdirection' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'grounds for Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queensland Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the convictions were unsafe or unsatisfactory under s 668E of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld)' "Whether the trial judge's directions regarding background sexual abuse evidence gave rise to a miscarriage of justice" 'Whether irregular withdrawal of counts from the jury constituted a procedural defect warranting appellate intervention']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed because the trial judge's directions in respect of general background evidence of sexual abuse were erroneous and insufficient, creating a substantial possibility the jury was mistaken or misled; this amounted to a miscarriage of justice under s 668E of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld). Accordingly, the convictions were quashed and a new trial ordered.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Order of the Court of Appeal of Queensland set aside' 'Appeal to the Court of Appeal allowed' 'Convictions quashed' 'A new trial ordered on counts 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7']