Alfred v Lanscar [2007] FCA 1514
The orders as formally published contained a clerical error and were incomplete. The Court, applying the slip rule, republished the orders as intended to reflect that the first respondent contravened s 298S(2)(a) and (b), and the second respondent was also in contravention. Penalties were imposed accordingly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment; Slip Rule Correction of Orders
- Outcome
- Orders corrected and republished; penalties imposed on respondents by consent.
- Legal Topics
- ['union Membership' 'coercion' 'slip Rule' 'penalties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment; Slip Rule Correction of Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents contravened s 298S(2)(a) and s 298S(2)(b) of the pre-reform Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) by requiring painters to join the union to work on a particular site or by coercing non-members']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders as formally published contained a clerical error and were incomplete. The Court, applying the slip rule, republished the orders as intended to reflect that the first respondent contravened s 298S(2)(a) and (b), and the second respondent was also in contravention. Penalties were imposed accordingly.
Court Disposition
Orders corrected and republished; penalties imposed on respondents by consent.
Orders
- ['Penalty of $2,000 imposed on the first respondent for contraventions of s 298S(2)(a) and (b).' 'Penalty of $10,000 imposed on the second respondent for contraventions of s 298S(2)(a) and (b).' 'Penalties to be paid into the Consolidated Revenue Fund within 28 days.' 'Declarations and orders take effect from 4 July...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment