Killeen v Combined Communications Network Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 27
Sections 1.11, 9.1 and 9.3 of the Disability Standards, in their application to accessible taxis, do not require an allocated space for a wheelchair to be a rectangular prism without any encroachments; the ground-level clear space must be at least 800 mm by 1300 mm, and minimum head room applies only in relevant vertical planes through which the occupant's head and shoulders pass during entry and to the point of final position. Encroachments are permitted above the ground-level area, provided they do not impede use or require lowering the head or changing normal posture during access and positioning.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Discrimination / Separate Question Ordered and Determined Before Trial
- Outcome
- Question determined; answered 'no'
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Discrimination' 'statutory Interpretation' 'standards for Accessible Public Transport']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Discrimination / Separate Question Ordered and Determined Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper construction of ss 1.11, 9.1 and 9.3 of the Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002 (Cth) as they apply to accessible taxis' 'Whether allocated spaces for wheelchairs must be rectangular prisms with no encroachments above clear floor area']
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 1.11, 9.1 and 9.3 of the Disability Standards, in their application to accessible taxis, do not require an allocated space for a wheelchair to be a rectangular prism without any encroachments; the ground-level clear space must be at least 800 mm by 1300 mm, and minimum head room applies only in relevant vertical planes through which the occupant's head and shoulders pass during entry and to the point of final position. Encroachments are permitted above the ground-level area, provided they do not impede use or require lowering the head or changing normal posture during access and positioning.
Court Disposition
Question determined; answered 'no'
Orders
- ['The proceedings be listed for further directions on 28 February 2011 at 9:30 a.m.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment