Gregory Travis Robinson v. Pittwater Council [1998] NSWLEC 132
Clause 21F(3)(c) of the Pittwater Local Environment Plan 1993 operates to preserve the applicant's right to subdivide the dual occupancy development on the subject land, as the consent was granted under SREP 12 and SEPP 25 applied after the relevant amending date. Therefore, the development application is capable of being granted consent under the amended plan.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law
- Outcome
- Question of law answered in the affirmative; appeal to proceed to hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'subdivision of Dual Occupancy Development' 'interpretation of Local Planning Instruments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development application is capable of being granted consent under Pittwater Local Environment Plan 1993 (as amended)']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 21F(3)(c) of the Pittwater Local Environment Plan 1993 operates to preserve the applicant's right to subdivide the dual occupancy development on the subject land, as the consent was granted under SREP 12 and SEPP 25 applied after the relevant amending date. Therefore, the development application is capable of being granted consent under the amended plan.
Court Disposition
Question of law answered in the affirmative; appeal to proceed to hearing.
Orders
- ['The development application is capable of being granted consent under Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 1993 (as amended).' "The applicant's appeal should proceed to a hearing upon the basis of the answer provided." 'Leave to the parties to approach the Registrar to seek a date for that hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment