Trosse v Howard [2009] NSWCA 346
The primary judge erred by failing to articulate how Ms Howard's contributions made it just and equitable for her to benefit from the increase in value of the Whale Beach property, given she made no significant contribution to its acquisition, conservation or improvement. The most just and equitable order was for Mr Trosse to discharge the parties' liabilities and to indemnify Ms Howard, without further adjustment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['de Facto Relationships' 'adjustment of Property Interests' 'contributions Assessment' 'just and Equitable Adjustment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the primary judge erred in not articulating how parties' contributions justified the property adjustment" 'Whether Ms Howard was entitled to a share of the increased value of Whale Beach property' 'Appropriate treatment of losses and earnings sacrificed in Mediskill business venture' 'Appropriate approach to costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The primary judge erred by failing to articulate how Ms Howard's contributions made it just and equitable for her to benefit from the increase in value of the Whale Beach property, given she made no significant contribution to its acquisition, conservation or improvement. The most just and equitable order was for Mr Trosse to discharge the parties' liabilities and to indemnify Ms Howard, without further adjustment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' 'Set aside orders made below.' "Order Mr Trosse discharge the parties' liabilities to St George Bank and Visa within 28 days and indemnify Ms Howard." 'Dismiss the cross-claim.' "Order Mr Trosse pay one-half of Ms Howard's costs of the District Court proceedings." "Ms Howard to pay Mr Trosse's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment