Greywolf Resources NL v Wilkinson [2011] NSWSC 1604
The plaintiff commenced proceedings with insufficient affidavits providing no basis for the relief sought and repeatedly failed to comply with Court orders requiring amended pleadings and further affidavits, while the defendant was put to repeated appearances; it was therefore inappropriate to keep adjourning the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings by Summons Seeking Declarations and an Injunction Concerning Alleged Disclosure of Confidential Information / Directions Hearing; Dismissal for Non Compliance With Court Directions
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal for Want of Compliance With Directions' 'civil Procedure Act 2005, S 61' 'costs' 'effect of Dismissal Under Civil Procedure Act, S 92']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceedings by Summons Seeking Declarations and an Injunction Concerning Alleged Disclosure of Confidential Information / Directions Hearing; Dismissal for Non Compliance With Court Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the summons should be dismissed because the plaintiff repeatedly failed to comply with directions to file and serve an amended summons or statement of claim and supporting affidavits.' "Whether further adjournment would be appropriate where the defendant had been put to repeated trouble of appearing and the plaintiff's filed affidavits provided no basis for the relief sought."]
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff commenced proceedings with insufficient affidavits providing no basis for the relief sought and repeatedly failed to comply with Court orders requiring amended pleadings and further affidavits, while the defendant was put to repeated appearances; it was therefore inappropriate to keep adjourning the matter and the summons should be dismissed under s 61 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 61 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 I order that the summons be dismissed.' "Order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment