Griffiths v The Queen [1994] HCA 55

Griffiths v The Queen [1994] HCA 55

The conviction could not stand because the trial judge effectively withdrew from the jury the live issues arising under s 23 of the Criminal Code Qld and gave no adequate direction on the requirements of criminal negligence under s 289. The Crown bore the burden of proving beyond reasonable doubt either a voluntary act causing death in circumstances not amounting to murder and not excused by accident, or criminal negligence sufficient for manslaughter. The appellant's statement that the killing was an accident, together with the surrounding evidence, raised those issues. Because the trial miscarried and the Crown did not seek a retrial, the proper order was to quash the conviction and...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Manslaughter Conviction / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From Dismissal of Appeal by the Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; judgment and verdict of acquittal entered.
Legal Topics
['manslaughter' 'accident' 'voluntariness' 'criminal Negligence' 'jury Directions' 'burden of Proof' 'criminal Code Qld Ss 23 and 289']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['manslaughter' 'accident' 'voluntariness' 'criminal Negligence' 'jury Directions' 'burden of Proof' 'criminal Code Qld Ss 23 and 289']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Manslaughter Conviction / Appeal to the High Court of Australia From Dismissal of Appeal by the Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the trial judge wrongly withdrew from the jury issues arising under ss 23 and 289 of the Criminal Code Qld.' "Whether the Crown bore and discharged the burden of proving that the appellant's firing of the fatal bullet was voluntary or that the death was not an accident, or alternatively that the death was caused by criminal negligence." 'Whether the conviction for manslaughter could stand despite inadequate directions on accident, voluntariness and criminal negligence.' 'Whether, if the conviction was quashed, a retrial or an acquittal should be ordered.']

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction could not stand because the trial judge effectively withdrew from the jury the live issues arising under s 23 of the Criminal Code Qld and gave no adequate direction on the requirements of criminal negligence under s 289. The Crown bore the burden of proving beyond reasonable doubt either a voluntary act causing death in circumstances not amounting to murder and not excused by accident, or criminal negligence sufficient for manslaughter. The appellant's statement that the killing was an accident, together with the surrounding evidence, raised those issues. Because the trial miscarried and the Crown did not seek a retrial, the proper order was to quash the conviction and...

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; judgment and verdict of acquittal entered.

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed.' 'Order of the Court of Appeal set aside.' 'In lieu thereof the appeal to the Court of Appeal allowed.' 'Verdict set aside.' 'Conviction quashed.' 'Judgment and verdict of acquittal entered.']