Group One Limited v GTE Gesellschraft Fur Technische Entwicklungen GMBH [2022] FCA 767

Group One Limited v GTE Gesellschraft Fur Technische Entwicklungen GMBH [2022] FCA 767

Given the respondents have submitted to the Court’s jurisdiction, pleaded to allegations and are now without representation, it is appropriate and consistent with the Federal Court Act and Rules to make orders requiring them to nominate a new address for service to allow the matter to proceed efficiently.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Orders on Application for Address for Service After Respondents’ Solicitors Ceased to Act
Outcome
Orders made granting applicant leave to file interlocutory documents, requiring respondents to file a notice of address for service, and providing for possible judgment if respondents do not comply.
Legal Topics
['address for Service' 'patents' 'interlocutory Applications']
['practice and Procedure' 'intellectual Property'] ['address for Service' 'patents' 'interlocutory Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Orders on Application for Address for Service After Respondents’ Solicitors Ceased to Act

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether order should be made requiring respondents to file notice of address for service after withdrawal of their solicitors']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the respondents have submitted to the Court’s jurisdiction, pleaded to allegations and are now without representation, it is appropriate and consistent with the Federal Court Act and Rules to make orders requiring them to nominate a new address for service to allow the matter to proceed efficiently.

Court Disposition

Orders made granting applicant leave to file interlocutory documents, requiring respondents to file a notice of address for service, and providing for possible judgment if respondents do not comply.

Orders

  • ['Applicant has leave to file interlocutory application, affidavit, and submissions dated 28 June 2022.' 'Respondents to file a Notice of Address for Service in the jurisdiction as required by Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rule 11.08.' 'Applicant to forward a sealed copy of this order to respondents at their last...