Kearney v Grow Choice Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 325

Kearney v Grow Choice Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 325

Grow Choice failed to prove that Mr Kearney's repeated oral statements created any legally enforceable contract of guarantee. The conversations and pleading did not clearly support an implication that Mr Kearney was assuming personal liability for North West Direct Sales Pty Ltd's debts, and the evidence did not establish consideration because Mr Kearney did not seek forbearance, Grow Choice did not offer it, and Grow Choice did not convey that continued trading depended on his promise. After full argument, leave to appeal was granted and the appeal allowed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From District Court Civil Judgment / Court of Appeal Judgment on Concurrent Hearing
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; District Court judgment against Mr Kearney set aside; amended statement of claim dismissed so far as it claimed relief against Mr Kearney; respondent ordered to pay the applicant/appellant's costs in this Court.
Legal Topics
['guarantee and Indemnity' 'oral Contract of Guarantee' 'consideration' 'forbearance From Suing' 'continuing to Trade' 'leave to Appeal']
['contract Law' 'appellate Procedure'] ['guarantee and Indemnity' 'oral Contract of Guarantee' 'consideration' 'forbearance From Suing' 'continuing to Trade' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From District Court Civil Judgment / Court of Appeal Judgment on Concurrent Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mr Kearney entered into a contract of guarantee with Grow Choice for debts owed by North West Direct Sales Pty Ltd.' 'Whether Grow Choice gave consideration for any promise by Mr Kearney, by forbearance from suing or by continuing to trade with North West Direct Sales Pty Ltd.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted where the amount in dispute was below the threshold for an appeal without leave.']

Ratio Decidendi

Grow Choice failed to prove that Mr Kearney's repeated oral statements created any legally enforceable contract of guarantee. The conversations and pleading did not clearly support an implication that Mr Kearney was assuming personal liability for North West Direct Sales Pty Ltd's debts, and the evidence did not establish consideration because Mr Kearney did not seek forbearance, Grow Choice did not offer it, and Grow Choice did not convey that continued trading depended on his promise. After full argument, leave to appeal was granted and the appeal allowed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; District Court judgment against Mr Kearney set aside; amended statement of claim dismissed so far as it claimed relief against Mr Kearney; respondent ordered to pay the applicant/appellant's costs in this Court.

Orders

  • ['Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the judgment and orders in the District Court of 2 June 2023.' 'Grant leave to the appellant to file and rely on the amended notice of appeal annexed to the notice of motion dated 12 December 2023, and direct the appellant to file the amended notice of appeal by 12 January...