Grundfos Pumps Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs [1996] FCA 462
The goods were objectively identified as an electrically powered centrifugal pump with an automatic floating level switch attached, and their principal function was to pump liquids. The automatic float switch was an incidental feature and did not make the goods automatic regulating or controlling instruments or apparatus within heading 9032. Notes 1(f) and 6(a) to Chapter 90 did not expand heading 9032 to include the goods, and the Court was in any event bound by Liebert. The goods were therefore not classifiable under heading 9032.89.90, and the Tribunal's classification under heading 8413.70.90 stood.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Concerning Customs Tariff Classification Under the Customs Tariff Act 1987 (cth) / Federal Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including reserved costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['customs Tariff Classification' 'classification of Pumps' 'automatic Regulating or Controlling Instruments and Apparatus' 'binding Full Court Authority']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Concerning Customs Tariff Classification Under the Customs Tariff Act 1987 (cth) / Federal Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the goods should be classified under heading 9032.89.90 as automatic regulating or controlling instruments and apparatus or under heading 8413.70.90 as pumps for liquids.' 'Whether the goods were properly identified as an electrically powered centrifugal pump with an automatic floating level switch attached.' "Whether Chapter 90 notes 1(f) and 6(a) assisted the applicant's classification argument." 'Whether the Full Court decision in Liebert Corporation Australia Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs was binding and determinative.']
Ratio Decidendi
The goods were objectively identified as an electrically powered centrifugal pump with an automatic floating level switch attached, and their principal function was to pump liquids. The automatic float switch was an incidental feature and did not make the goods automatic regulating or controlling instruments or apparatus within heading 9032. Notes 1(f) and 6(a) to Chapter 90 did not expand heading 9032 to include the goods, and the Court was in any event bound by Liebert. The goods were therefore not classifiable under heading 9032.89.90, and the Tribunal's classification under heading 8413.70.90 stood.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including reserved costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment